Mutton, Meters. Age., & Gilbride, K. Within the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and in conflict relationship (pp. 33-60). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]
Lee, L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & More youthful, J. (2008). In the event the I am not saying hot, could you be sexy or not?: Physical-appeal studies and you may relationship choice since the a purpose of one’s individual elegance. Emotional Research, 19, 669677. [ Hyperlinks ]
Levinger, Grams., & Rands, Yards. (1985)patibility in marriage or other personal relationship. During the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you can incompatible relationship (pp. 309-331). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Number of ambition. Into the J. McV. Seem (Ed.), Identification as well as the behavior issues (Vol. step one, pp. 333378). Ny: Ronald Press. [ Links ]
Loving, T. J. (2006). Forecasting relationship relationship future that have insiders’ and you can outsiders’ position: Who and you may what is actually asked matters. Private Relationships, thirteen, 349-362. [ Links ]
Luo, S., & Klohnen, Elizabeth. C. (2005). Assortative mating how to delete uberhorny and you can marital quality in newly wedded couples: A few centered method. Diary out-of Character and you may Societal Mindset, 88, 304-326. [ Hyperlinks ]
Legitimizing circumstances about initiation out-of heterosexual dating
Lutz-Zois, C. J., Bradley, Good. C., Mihalik, J. L., & Moorman-Eavers, E. Roentgen. (2006). Detected similarity and dating victory among relationship lovers: An idiographic method. Log out of Societal and personal Matchmaking, 23, 865-880. [ Website links ]
Madden, Yards., & Lenhart, A good. (2006). Dating. Washington, DC: Report for the Pew Websites & Western Life Investment. Recovered , away from [ Website links ]
MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, M. (1999). Examining the accuracy out of forecasts on the relationships matchmaking: Just how and exactly why carry out lovers’ forecasts change from those created by observers? Identification and you will Social Therapy Bulletin, twenty-five, 14171429. [ Links ]
The new interest-similarity theory one of get across-gender nearest and dearest: Dating pleasure, imagined parallels, and you can care about-serving thinking
ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Papers exhibited during the First Global Meeting to your Personal Dating, Madison, WI. [ Website links ]
Merkle, Age.R., & Richardson, Roentgen.A beneficial. (2000). Electronic relationship and digital connected: Conceptualizing computers mediated close relationships. Family relations, forty two, 187-192. [ Hyperlinks ]
Montoya, Roentgen. Yards., Horton, Roentgen. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is actually genuine resemblance essential destination? An excellent meta-analysis off actual and thought similarity. Diary of Public and personal Relationships, twenty five, 889-922. [ Website links ]
Morry, M. Meters. (2005). Relationship pleasure since a great predictor of similarity recommendations; A test of one’s destination-resemblance hypothesis. Diary out of Social and private Dating, twenty-two, 561-584. [ Backlinks ]
Murstein, B. I. (1987). A clarification and extension of your own SVR principle away from dyadic combining. Record off ily, 49, 929-947. [ Links ]
Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who can breakup: An effective fourteen-year longitudinal study of black colored partners and you may white partners. Journal out-of Public and private Matchmaking, 19, 179-202. [ Hyperlinks ]
Orenstein, S. (). This new love formula Meets thinks it has got found a formula having governing the net dating providers: A technological approach to finding Mr. otherwise Ms. Best. Team 2.0 Mag. Retrieved towards the from [ Hyperlinks ]
Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Precisely the congruent endure – Identity parallels into the couples. Identity and Individual Differences, forty five, 533-535. [ Links ]
Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, Roentgen. (2000). Spouse choices: Exactly what qualities perform visitors appeal within brief-identity sexual and you may enough time-name romantic lovers? Diary from Therapy and you will Human Sex, 12, 1-21. [ Website links ]
Reis, H. T. (1985). The newest part of the care about on initiation and you may course of personal interaction. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you will incompatible relationships (pp. 209-231). New york: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]
Leave A Comment